The nation is conducting its inaugural legislative polls after the removal of the previous regime, marking a cautious step towards democratic processes which have been questioned as potentially biased toward the country's provisional government.
As the battle-scarred state moves along its governmental shift following the former regime, area delegates are commencing the significant milestone of choosing an interim assembly.
One-third of assembly seats will be directly appointed by the interim leader in a step seen as strengthening his influence. The other 67% will be chosen via regional electoral bodies, with seats allocated based on demographic numbers.
Direct popular voting has been excluded since transitional leaders explained the widespread relocation of residents and documentation loss amid fighting eras would render such measure impossible at this stage.
"There are multiple pending legislation that require approval to move forward with rebuilding and growth initiatives. Rebuilding Syria constitutes a collective mission, with every citizen needs to engage toward this project."
The interim authorities dissolved Syria's previous rubber-stamp legislature after assuming power.
The recently created 210-representative assembly, named the Popular Assembly, will handle passing fresh voting laws and foundational law. According to organizational committees, more than 1,500 candidates – merely 14% female representation – are competing for seats in the parliament, that will function with a extendable two-and-half-year mandate while organizing later voting.
Under established regulations, would-be legislators should not back the previous government while refraining from advocating breakup or fragmentation.
Among those running is Syrian-American the aspirant Henry, the first Jewish contender since the 1940s.
Electoral activities were indefinitely postponed in the predominantly Druze Sweida region plus in zones administered by Kurdish-dominated groups due to ongoing tensions among regional officials and national leadership.
Critics contend the electoral college mechanism could advantage influential figures, giving the transitional government unfair edge while marginalizing specific cultural and faith groups. However, for other observers, the election represented an advancement sign.
After being contacted by voting authorities to become part of the voting assembly, the physician Daaboul, a medical practitioner from Damascus, said she first refused, concerned about the duty and unfavorable image of past legislatures. But after understanding she would simply function within the electoral college, she consented, calling it "a civic duty".
During voting day, she commented: "This represents my debut electoral participation in my existence. I'm content, and I don't mind waiting in extended queues."
Lara Eezouki, an electoral commission member in Damascus, highlighted that the new assembly incorporates each spiritual community and demographic sections and characterized it as "the pioneering instance in the nation's past when elections truly decide – when outcomes aren't predetermined".
Ibrahim Halabi, who previously served under Assad's rule but defected following massive anti-government protests that faced brutal suppression and initiated domestic fighting over a decade ago, stated: "This signifies the pioneering moment throughout our lifetime we've taken part in an open election mechanism without external pressure."
A tech enthusiast and digital strategist with over a decade of experience in emerging technologies and content creation.